The Parochial Field was substantially developed in 2017 in an attempt to level the field. Was this 2017 Parochial Field development work legal?.
The above and below photos taken 2 days (20/08/2024) before the devastating flood show the topographical change to the Parochial Field and the substantial depth of topsoil and subsoil removed.
Photos and a video were taken (20/08/2017) of the Parochial Field due the size of the cut and angle of the topsoil and subsoil removed directly beside my mother’s shed. This was concerning on multiple levels : subsidence, structural and the thought of the shed falling into the Parochial Field potentially causing injury. The biggest fear in all of this was due to Clonmany Festival funfair rides being placed in the vicinity of the shed, coupled with vibrations from all the funfair rides.
My mother nor our family were pre-notified of this development work and were in complete shock when it happened. This work was carried out pre the 2017 festival, July?? time.
I raised concerns regarding this development in regard to the shed with one of the Festival Committee members, informing them that I would be taking some photos, getting a professional to look at them and get back to them. By chance, these photos were taken 2 days before the 2017 devasting flood. Fears of the shed falling into the Parochial Field during the 2017 Festival receded somewhat on seeing the layout of the Funfair. The area beside the shed was used to accommodate the Funfair caravans.
These photos, video stills and concerns were put to a professional in the industry. They said that it looked concerning from the photos and recommended getting it checked out by the appropriate professional, a Civil Engineer, due to my Funfair concerns. An onsite meeting was arranged with the Festival Committee.
At this meeting I was surprised that multiple festival personnel were present, I was expecting 2 at most. I didn’t assume anything other than this was a show of strength, but in no way intimidating. At the location of the embankment beside the shed, I relayed my concerns regarding the level of the cut, angle of the cut, subsidence, structural damage and the possibility of the shed crashing into the field at the festival. The potential effects of the Funfair were highlighted. I asked, did they seek professional advice. They replied that they didn’t and that they had relied on the expertise of the digger man.
I told them of the advice that I had received and that it needed to be checked by a Civil Engineer. There was no push back on this. However, I was taken aback when one member of the party suggested that they would leave it us (as a family) to sort it out. Rightly or wrongly, I took this as an attempt to burden my elderly mother with both the process and the cost of getting their development work assessed. I instantly and forthrightly retorted that it was their job to get it sorted as they had created this sloped embankment. Some of the Festival Committee members were shocked, I never did find out if it was due to my forthright retort or the suggestion that my mother should be burdened with the process and cost of this civil Engineering investigation work.
John Bradley
The resultant Foyle Consulting Engineers report was dated 01/08/2018, 4 days prior to the start of the 2018 festival.
The Foyle Consulting Engineers report stated that “the excavation is not deemed to have any detrimental effect on the existing shed” and “the fairground operations that take place within the festival field wo have no effect on the existing shed”.
However, the Foyle Consulting Engineers report did propose enhancements/modifications to the embankment,
“In order to lessen the impact of the embankment; to guard against any future erosion of exposed soil and to lesson any potential
health and safety risk, I would recommend that any overburden above the floor level of the shed be removed and that the embankment
be filled out, compacted, lined with topsoil and landscaped at an angle not exceeding 30 degrees.”.
This "any overburden above the floor level of the shed be removed" is the tree lined boundary between my mother's land and the Parochial Field. My Mother's property deeds will attest to this tree lined boundary line. Any attempt to remove this boundary ('overburden') needs to be agreed in advance.
John Bradley
The site layout map in the Foyle Consulting Engineers report clearly defined the degree of slope to be filled out at 3 points (A, B and C). The report recommended that the base of the slope at points A,B, and C be extended by
From the report dated, 01/08/2018 to 01/01/2025 ( 6 years and 5 months, 2345 days ), this recommended work to guard against “further erosion” and “to lesson any potential health and safety risks” has not been addressed.
Not only has the slope been exposed to six and a half years of “further erosion” (7.5+ years after initial development), a section of the embankment has been excavated in April 2024 at the time of the ESB Networks development work in Parochial Field. It is assumed that this was the initial intended location of the ESB Network’s Substation. The Substation was relocated due to its proximity to a home heating oil tank, once ESB Networks were made aware of the location and concerns regarding this home heating oil tank. This initial ESB Networks Substation was to be located in the proposed Kids Play Park.
One of the photos taken on the 20/08/2017, include a photo of crack on the back of house facing shed wall.
0/08/2017 - the only place that I could put a 20c coin.
12/03/2024 - crack could take a 1€ coin
11/01/2025 - crack can take two 1€ coins
On the 12/03/2024 while taking photos for my planning objection, I had a look at the crack on the shed. It just about took a 1 Euro coin (2.33mm), a 50c coin (2.38mm) was too big to insert.
Width of Euro Coins
Crack Progression
Aug 2017 -> Mar 2024 -> Jan 2025
2.14mm -> 2.33mm -> 4.66mm
Aug 2017 -> Mar 2023
8.87% increase in 79 months.
Mar 2024 -> Jan 2025
100% increase in next 10 months.
ESB Networks Embankment Excavation April 2024.
Aug 2017 -> Jan 2025
117.76% in total.
John Bradley
Taking the substantial excavation and disruption of the embankment soil in tandem with the lack of the Foyle Consulting Engineers Health & Safety embankment enhancements to guard against "further erosion" of the exposed soil and to "lesson any potential health and safety risk",
Will Clonmany Enterprise Development Ltd and/or ESB Networks employ Civil Engineers to analyse this embankment in regard to the elderly lady's shed in respect to subsidence, structural damage and the possibility of the shed crashing into the field?
Is this 2017 Parochial Field development work legal? If not, should the Parochial Field be returned to its pre 2017 development state?